We mean the well-structured and internally consistent statement of “the thought.”
Systematic thinking is possible when a body of universal principles relating to life, cosmos and human being is formulated coherently and connected with practical matters in an orderly way by using a certain method enabling to understand how these two branches of “the thought” are interrelated with one another. What facilitates this coherence or “internal consistency” is, indeed, the method itself. Namely, thinking methodically is a typical characteristic of which the thought evolved into the stage of “systematization.” If the ideas can be stated in accordance with the principles of methodical thinking, it means that “orderly thinking” have already been achieved. This is what we call “systematic thinking.” If it does not exist, it means that the thought has still “eclectic” and “subjective” character, that is to say, ideas could not be arranged in regular order, and thereby the proposed solutions to the problems of humanity turn out to be inadequate for the very reason that they are mostly put forward by selecting arbitrarily what seems best or convenient from different schools of thought. This is the main reason of which they are insufficient to convince the hearts and minds of the people.